Feminism Causes Breast Cancer

I was surprised to see an article like this. Although, it said everything but link the rise in feminism to the rise in breast cancer.

Note the following:

Breast cancer cases hit a new record of 36,939 in the United Kingdom in 2004, representing an 81-percent increase in the incidence of the cancer since 1971, official figures show.

The relentless upward trend in breast cancer, the commonest cancer in the UK, is driven by increasing prosperity and the nature of modern lifestyles, accounting for one in three of all newly diagnosed cases of cancer in females.

Economic progress has led to smaller families, delayed childbirth and less breastfeeding as women have gone out to work.

Having fewer children before the age of 30, early menarche, late menopause and being obese or overweight after menopause are said to be all factors behind the increase.

Nature of modern lifestyles? Smaller families? Delayed childbirth? Less breastfeeding? Career chicks? Fewer kids? Being obese?

Sounds like feminism to me. This is a real wake up call to women. Feminism is causing much more damage to women than just making them end up single, alone, and with cats. Moreover, with men leaving the building per se in the Anglosphere, it seems that there won't be any recourse for women. Discuss among yourselves.  ¶ 2:40 PM

  Activism - Moving Forward

I flew into this one city on business, and as the taxi was taking me downtown to my hotel, I noticed anti- circumcision advertisements on the back of metro buses in that city by the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers. This is a great idea at spreading the hazards and dangers of infant circumcision to the general public. The advertisement is a father holding a boy baby with the words "Today's Parents Are Saying No To Circumcision". Note two things about this advertisement:

1) The father is pictured as a integral part of the child's life, and not just a wage slave/sperm donor as the feminists picture fathers.

2) The father is pictured as the protector of the child from the dangers and harms of the world, in this particular advertisement, the dangers of circumcision. None of this, father - bad, mother - good, bullshit the feminists propagate.

This is a positive step in the right direction in America to get the public informed about circumcision, since the medical establishment here is highly feminized with a fanatic like approach to circumcise newborn male infants. Definitely check out the link above if you are planning to have kids in the future, especially if here in the US - which I highly doubt any of the Mirror's readers are ever going to do, but still the information might be applicable overseas in case the medical establishment wherever you are becomes fanatical in their approach to infant circumcision.  ¶ 8:22 AM

  Pope Speaks Truth, Mohammedans Get Bent Over It

Now this is a classic juxtaposition, watching the superficial state of Turkey - held together only by the US taxpayers' dollars and US loans (or as my friends in Canada say "Turkey is the 52nd state of the US" and "Israel, of course, is the 51st state of the US") - criticizing the Pope about his speech as in this article.

Note the following:

Turkey's ruling Islamic-rooted party joined a wave of criticism of Pope Benedict XVI on Friday, accusing him of trying to revive the spirit of the Crusades with remarks he made about Islam. A party official said the pontiff would go down in history "in the same category as leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini" for his words.

Yes, yes, and of course, this is coming from Turkey who is already in the history books as the most genocidal nation to ever exist. Here is just a small sample of evidence for those in America and the Anglosphere with a limited view of the history of Turkey:

1.5 Million Armenians Slaughtered By Turks

Armenian Genocide in Turkey 1915

Genocide Of the Pontian Greeks by Turkey

The Hellenic Genocide By The Turks

The Assyrian Genocide By Turkey

Of course, the human rights record on Turkey is equally appalling as noted:

Human Rights Watch - Turkey

Human Rights In Turkey

No security without human rights

Continuing with the Pope's speech:

The pope quoted from a book recounting a conversation between 14th century Byzantine Christian Emperor Manuel Paleologos II and a Persian scholar on the truths of Christianity and Islam. "The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war," the pope said. "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached,'" he quoted the emperor as saying. He did not explicitly agree with them nor repudiate them.

Sounds correct, considering all the genocides the Islamic Turks have committed upon the world in the name of Allah.   ¶ 5:30 AM

  In The Navy

Although, the Village People, with their song "In The Navy" above, forever destroyed the image of the US Navy, the Navy isn't helping their image with stupid things like banning a Navy chaplin from praying in "Jesus" name as in this article.

Note the following:

A priest in the Evangelical Episcopal Church who has served as a U.S. Navy chaplain is asking a military court to dismiss a series of complaints filed against him after he was caught praying in "Jesus" name.

The order not to pray in Jesus name was inappropriate, Klingenschmitt's motion to dismiss argues, because federal law "expressly protects a chaplain's right to 'conduct public worship according to the manner and forms of the church of which he is a member.'"

Okay, I am no theologian here, but I would suppose part of being a Christian chaplin is praying, and Christians' usually pray in "Jesus" name, especially chaplins or priests.

And it gets sillier:

He said his superior officer, Capt. James R. Carr, then punished him for speaking about Jesus, and that decision was affirmed by officers higher up in rank.

Yeah...right on, el capitan...I think one would expect a Christian chaplin to speak about Jesus, it kinda goes with the last name "Christ" of the name "Jesus Christ" and Christianity in general.

And yet more silliness as in this article. The same Navy chaplin, who also went on a hunger strike to protest the Navy's prayer policy (I don't even want to know what the policy is, considering all this nonsense that the Navy already does) also gets punished for preaching the Gospel:

But after the sermon at the service, which "included references to Jesus Christ as the way of salvation," Klingenschmitt said he received complaints from Carr and others, who claimed they were offended by the "exclusive" message.

Once again, I am no theologian, but I would expect to hear the Gospel from a Christian chaplin, or maybe I should have expected the Gospel Of The Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Political correctness to the nth power is sailing the Navy these days, it's high time to bring back the Village People to run the Navy!  ¶ 7:50 AM

  Chairwoman Fired, Stock Rises To 52 Week High

Seems another career chick in charge at Hewlett-Packard is toast because of corruption. This time it was Chairwoman Patricia Dunn as stated in this article. First, it was Carly Fiorina who destroyed Hewlett-Packard (and interestingly enough, it was right after she banned Easter holiday at Hewlett-Packard, that the company went to shit. God is not mocked, you piss Him off, you pay - even if the Christians in the Western Hemisphere celebrate Easter on the wrong day and from a pagan holiday, it is the heart of the matter than counts with God, although, I am sure He would like it to be called Resurrection Day instead of Easter, or follow the Eastern Orthodox Church and celebrate it as Pascha). Anyway, note the following:

Hewlett-Packard Chairwoman Patricia Dunn took the fall Tuesday after admitting she authorized an investigation that relied on “inappropriate techniques” to uncover who was leaking boardroom secrets to the media.

CEO Mark Hurd, who has the respect of Wall Street and is untainted by the investigation at the computer and printer maker, will take over, vowing that its methods “have no place in HP.” HP's stock rose to a 52-week high.

It was the culmination of a scandal that has rocked Silicon Valley's biggest and oldest technology company, led to investigations by state and federal authorities, and raised questions about one of the most powerful women in corporate America.

This is nice to hear. The man is untainted, and we are now raising questions about career chicks. About freaking time this nonsense that women are good and holy and men are bad and evil starts to end.

"She needed to go — she had become a liability to the company whether she liked it or not,” said Morningstar analyst Mark Lanyon. “But just removing her from the chairperson role and keeping her on the board is a half-measure at best and probably not appropriate.

Hmm...once again, women are liabilities, and not just in relationships with men. I like the fact they are calling for her full removal from Hewlett Packard, beyond her just stepping down as chairwoman and probably sitting around doing nothing as a useless career chick board member.

  ¶ 9:09 AM

  Perspective 73

Our Guest Connaisseur writes:

I have been taken to the cleaners too many times by women - who said they would never do such a thing to me. The term "gold digger" was not coined without cause. 99.99% of prenups are to protect his ASSets, and no man should plow a feminine furrow without one... EVER! I think one should even sign a predating prenup....I joke that I have had one date in this century, but it is true. The main reason why I have had one date is I am never going to give a woman part of my assets again, or be in the position where she can get one penny of my hard work. Am I bitter? Oh you bet, big time, and no, I am NOT going to get over it in this lifetime. I am female-free and there are financial advantages to that. I will socialize with them from afar, but I know from multiple experiences that when she puts her hand in my pocket she's reaching for my wallet, not something else.  ¶ 8:00 AM

  You Will Soon Call Me..."Emperor"

Not even the republic's immigrants want to vote - even with marches and rallies to get them to vote, as described in this article. Another utter failure, like the Rock The Vote nonsense.

Note the following:

MARCHERS who thronged the streets of Los Angeles to protest what they felt unfair immigration legislation waved placards that proclaimed "Today We March, Tomorrow We Vote." Too bad this bold political promise has turned out to be just sloganeering.

An Associated Press review of voter rolls just closed for the upcoming November 2006 election show no sign of the promised new voter boom.

Worse, voter registration rolls in Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Phoenix, Atlanta, Chicago and other cities that witnessed similar immigration protests are way down from 2004, when there was a huge push in voter registration drives.

It's especially disheartening that young people ages 18-25, who were so caught up in the emotion of the events, haven't followed through by registering and voting. The enthusiasm that put them at the marches, proudly wearing their culture on their sleeves, has been squandered.

We're at a loss to explain what happened. The considerable effort and coordination expended on organizing the rallies could just as easily have been applied to registering voters. If activists can bus protesters, certainly they can take people to the polls.

Protests can pump the blood and stir pride, and they do indeed send messages. But by not following up at the polls, the organizers and protesters have reduced a powerful cry of protest to a whimper. Is anyone surprised that members of Congress followed suit with rhetoric instead of reform?

I'll tell you what happened, with the feminization of American society pronounced now more than ever, everybody is thinking and acting like women - who don't care to actually do anything, but just like the emotional drama which rallies and marches provide to make them "feel" good about themselves - the stupid Rock The Vote nonsense was a prime example. Men act, women don't, or in this case, men vote, women don't - that is why my first Imperial decree will be to ban women from voting - they don't do it anyway, and by doing so, it will allow a more efficient and effective voting process for men - of course, to vote for me, since I will be the only candidate as Emperor.

Now, with men leaving the republic or in jail, women too busy...well, being women, and young Americans feminized, as well as immigrants, declaring myself Emperor seems the logical choice to give guidance and meaning to my subjects...I mean...constituents. With women or the female mindset imparted through feminization on the vast majority of society, it will be very easy to control the Empire...I mean...the republic.  ¶ 5:47 AM

  Have The Men Left The Republic?

Here is an article about the increasing lack of voter turnout in recent elections in the US.

Note the following:

Voter turnout for elections is on the decline. In Hillsborough County, as predicted, only 20-percent of registered voters cast their ballots in Tuesday's primary election.

"I still vote, but I know a lot of people are disgusted with the government," Tampa resident Ernie Carrera said. "They just don't get things done."

"People are frustrated and feel disenfranchised and don't feel their voice matters," Buckhorn said. "And as a result, ever since probably the 1960s we've seen an increasingly lower and lower participation level."

"People have to want to vote," Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections Buddy Johnson said. "I mean incentives? I mean why an incentive for freedom? It ought not to have to be done."

Let's take a look at this stuff. I think it is a combination of men not giving a crap anymore - men leaving the republic via dropping out of society and others expating overseas, and the fact that 1 in 75 American men are in jail - it's hard to vote if you are in the big house. If you want change in a republic, you are going to have to vote in leaders that will do the job, although, it might be hard finding men to do that, if the men of the republic aren't believing in it anymore, and have left the building.

Note also:

Low voter turnout is so bad nationwide that some states are now considering offering incentives. Arizona is considering a lottery where people could win up to a million dollars just for casting their vote.

Some countries are making it mandatory to vote, and if you don't you face a fine.

Incentives? Fines?

Yes!

Nothing like good 'ol fashion bribing or strong arm tactics to force the people to comply. Gimme that old fashion government.

But where are the strong independent American women? Why aren't they leading the population to vote more? Aren't they voting themselves? You mean all the women's liberation was in vain? You mean American women are too busy shopping, getting rich in the marriage/divorce market, aborting their kids, being misandrist harpies, career chicks, and desperate-soccer mom-SUV driving-keep up with Jones-housewives than to care about voting? Say it ain't so!

Susan B. Anthony must be rolling over in her grave.

Well, then, since nobody is caring about voting anymore, I might as well declare myself Emperor, and ban women from voting - it's in the best interest of my subjects...I mean..constituents. It will be the first of many Imperial decrees to set the Empire...err...I mean...the republic straight...  ¶ 7:38 AM

  Excellent Article By Stephen Baskerville

If this article does not convince men in America not to marry, then they deserve everything they get in divorce court. Stephen sums up the whole rigged game of marriage in America.

Note the insight on family law:

Family law now allows mothers to walk away from marriages at any time and take the children with them. Not only is this permitted, it is encouraged and rewarded with financial incentives. Even more disturbing, in some cases, mothers are actually pressured by social service agencies into filing for a divorce that they don’t want. The Massachusetts News reported how Heidi Howard was ordered by the state’s Department of Social Services to divorce her husband Neil or lose her children, though DSS acknowledged he had not been violent. When she refused the social workers seized her children, including a newborn and attempted to terminate the Howards’ parental rights. News reporter Nev Moore says she has seen hundreds such cases.

Note the insight on the courts:

These bureaucratic courts [divorce/family courts] emerged in the 1960s and 1970s along with the divorce revolution. Their existence and virtually every problem they address – divorce, custody, child abuse, child support enforcement, even juvenile crime – depend upon one overriding principle: The removal of the father as head of the family. When parental authority functions properly, family courts have little reason to exist, since these problems seldom appear among intact families. While both fathers and mothers may fall afoul of family court judges, it is fathers against whom their enmity is largely directed, because fathers are their principal rivals.

Note the insight on judges and constitutional rights:

The judges’ contempt for both fathers and constitutional rights was openly expressed by New Jersey municipal court judge Richard Russell: "Your job is not to become concerned about the constitutional rights of the man that you’re violating," he told his colleagues at a judges’ training seminar in 1994. "Throw him out on the street, give him the clothes on his back and tell him, see ya around…. We don’t have to worry about the rights."

Note the insight on search and seizure:

Once the parent "loses custody," in the jargon of the court, he can be arrested for trying to see them outside of authorized times and places. He can be arrested for running into his children in a public place such as the zoo, sporting events, or church. Additionally, parents are routinely summoned to court for questioning about their private lives, which attorney Jed Abraham has characterized as an "interrogation." Their personal documents and homes must be surrendered to government officials without warrants. Their children are alienated with the backing of government officials and then are required to inform on them.

And summed up nicely:

The divorce industry has, in affect, rendered marriage a fraudulent contract.

Fraudulent contract, Amen to that. When American women insult you for being a non-commitment, unchivalrous, selfish, expating, foreign woman marrying, good for nothing, video game playing adultolescent, remember, you have every right to be.  ¶ 9:51 AM